Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mott et al v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Stuart Mott and Nancy Mott
Defendant:
Raytheon Company, Goulds Pumps, LLC, Honeywell International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Abb, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Pneumo Abex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Webb et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv00145
Defendant:
3M Company, Bayer Consumer Care Holdings LLC, Bayer Samson II LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Allan Watson, Robin A. Webb, Cynthia M. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Lishman et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01570
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Inc Caterpillar, Crane Co. and others
Counter Defendant:
Nash Engineering Co., Inc., Flowserve US Inc., Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Tate Andale, Inc., Velan Valve Corp., Honeywell International Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
John Crane Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vicki Lishman
Cross Claimant:
Grinnell LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Begin v. Air & Liquid System Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00830
Defendant:
CSR, Ltd, Air & Liquid System Corporation, Rockwell Automation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ginny Begin and William D. Begin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MUSSELMAN v. AMPHENOL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv69486
Defendant:
GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC, AMPHENOL CORPORATION, BONDEX INTERNATIONAL INC. and others
Special Master:
VINCENT J. POPPITI
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. MUSSELMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Musselman v. Amphenol Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00101
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC, Amphenol Corporation, Bondex International Inc. and others
Special Master:
SPECIAL MASTER Vincent J. Poppiti, -SM-
Plaintiff:
Michael Musselman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
