Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Clark v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02760
Plaintiff:
Anita Clark
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv34815
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARLA ANITA CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv09000
Plaintiff:
ANITA CLARK and WILLIAM CLARK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TAC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
Anita Clark
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceutical USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Anita Clark
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceutical USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark et al v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01993
Plaintiff:
Anita Clark and Ahmi Clark
Defendant:
Fluor Enterprises, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17773
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Company, Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Clark, Terry Clark, Terry Clark and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
AYDELL et al
as 2:2007cv73953
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM I AYDELL, WILLIAM I AYDELL, WILLIAM I AYDELL and others
Defendant:
GAYLE YOUNG, GAYLE YOUNG, GAYLE YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
