Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Bratton v. BTR-Way Logistics, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00855
Defendant:
Khurshed Pulodovich Ubaydov and BTR-Way Logistics, LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert A Bratton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BRATTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10555
Plaintiff:
GARY T BRATTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRATTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03873
Plaintiff:
CHRIS BRATTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRATTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv17041
Plaintiff:
DANNA BRATTON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRATTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10375
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BRATTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bratton v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Mark Bratton
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
BRATTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06776
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BRATTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRATTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05496
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER BRATTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KONO v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04684
Plaintiff:
CASEY KONO, DAVID VELASQUEZ, JONATHAN GRIFFITH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.