Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Thompson-Mitchell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00653
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thompson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv08208
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Thompson v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv10625
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thompson
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander, et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv06569
Plaintiff:
Tasha Alexander , Antoinette Anderson , Edgar Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Hello! Destination Management et al
as 2:2013cv02247
Defendant:
AGR Las Vegas, Inc. and Hello! Destination Management
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bosarge et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01226
Plaintiff:
Loyale Bosarge , Christine Dallas , Nora Draughon and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc. and CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01093
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thompson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thompson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc, American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc, Endo Pharmaceuticals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
