Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Dennys J. Cornejo v. Federal Bureau of Investigations
as 2:2023cv10187
Plaintiff:
Dennys Jose Cornejo
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CORNEJO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24582
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CORNEJO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pacheco v. Whyte et al
as 1:2023cv05747
Plaintiff:
Thomas Pacheco
Cross Defendant:
Ernell J. Whyte
Defendant:
Master Cooling Service Corporation, Steve Innocent, DJ Mystery, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Sunrise Office Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Salinas et al v. Twin Carports, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Tammy Salinas and Vanessa Espinoza
Defendant:
Twin Carports, LLC and David Teeny Cornejo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CORNEJO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09308
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE CORNEJO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CORNEJO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16931
Plaintiff:
MARVIN LEONETTI CORNEJO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CORNEJO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11569
Plaintiff:
MICHEL ANGELO CORNEJO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paul v. Cornejo
as 3:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Zlanpea Paul
Defendant:
Johanna Cornejo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Cornejo v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv02026
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Cornejo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Flores et al v. Cornejo et al
as 7:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
Celina Flores and Noe Everardo Flores
Defendant:
Alfredo Cornejo and Cornejo Forestry Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
