Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Allen et al v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2024cv00842
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Allen and Alyssah Darden
Defendant:
Timothy Daniel Sullivan, Sullivan Logistics, LLC and Blue Hill Specialty Insurance Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SULLIVAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12272
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DANIEL SULLIVAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sullivan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03004
Petitioner:
Daniel Sullivan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULLIVAN et al v. M&S TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00169
Defendant:
THE PEGGS COMPANY, INC., JOHN DOE #1, BEDROCK LOGISTICS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SULLIVAN and FRANCES SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SULLIVAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81568
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULLIVAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92241
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULLIVAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv49085
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULLIVAN v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01817
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivan v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv00216
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sullivan
Beanland, Mark et al v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv00967
Plaintiff:
Brad Solberg, Gary Connell, Andrew Cottrill and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
