Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gardner v. Franklin et al
as 4:2021cv03145
Plaintiff:
Glenda Sue Gardner and David Gardner
Defendant:
Frederick D. Franklin, Donald W. Kleine, Douglas County Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodwater et al v. Monsanto Company
as 8:2020cv00322
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Goodwater and Kathy Goodwater
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myers et al v. Davis et al
as 8:2019cv00540
Defendant:
William Davis and Rose Marie Davis
Plaintiff:
Claudia Myers and Donald Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brohimer v. Monsanto Company
as 8:2019cv00497
Plaintiff:
Donald A Brohimer and Donald A. Brohimer
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Greger v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2018cv00577
Plaintiff:
Donald R Greger and Donald R. Greger
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Gage v. Crete Carrier
as 4:2013cv03220
Defendant:
Crete Carrier
Plaintiff:
Donald Edward Gage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tucker v. Halls et al
as 4:2013cv03209
Defendant:
Donald H Breit, Carolyn S. Cody, Albert J. Halls and others
Plaintiff:
Ruby C. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Ruckman et al v. Estate of Donald W. Reeve
as 8:2011cv00180
Defendant:
Estate of Donald W. Reeve
Plaintiff:
Everett P. Ruckman and Sharon L. Ruckman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Havekost v. Ernest-Spencer Metals
as 8:2009cv00056
Defendant:
Ernest-Spencer Metals, Ernest-Spencer Metals and Ernest-Spencer Metals
Plaintiff:
Donald A. Havekost
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Crago v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2008cv00482
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Crago, Donald L. Crago, Donald L. Crago and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
