Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Richard Gaff v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03267
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Chemguard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Gaff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GAFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79759
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GAFF
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaff v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv11183
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Gaff
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 1:2016cv00918
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 2:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UTSCH'S MARINA, INC. v. MOTOR VESSEL, "POPS WAY", A 1976 26' PENN YAN, BEARING HULL ID NUMBER PYB26144M75G & REGISTRATION NUMBER NJ4159AK, HER ENGINE, TACKLE, APPAREL & HER APPURTENANCES IN REM et al
as 1:2011cv04056
Plaintiff:
UTSCH'S MARINA, INC.
Defendant:
MOTOR VESSEL, "POPS WAY", A 1976 26' PENN YAN, BEARING HULL ID NUMBER PYB26144M75G & REGISTRATION NUMBER NJ4159AK, HER ENGINE, TACKLE, APPAREL & HER APPURTENANCES IN REM, LARRY BESA, MOTOR VESSEL, A 1991 25' GRADY WHITE BEARING HULL ID NUMBER NTLCB508J091 & REGISTRATION NUMBER NJ8418FS, HER ENGINE, TACKLE, APPAREL & HER APPURTENANCES IN REM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Gaff et al v. Pfizer, Inc et al
as 2:2010cv03166
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lorain Gaff, Jr , Dena Mary Gaff , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
