Cases 1 - 10 of 222
MUKBEL v MAERSK LINE, LTD.
as 2:2024cv07772
Plaintiff:
WADAH MUKBEL
Defendant:
MAERSK LINE, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Combs et al. v. Alliance Shippers, Inc et al.
as 3:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Christopher Combs and Tammy Routson-Combs
Defendant:
Alliance Shippers, Inc, Kohl's Corporation, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
ROBINSON v. CARLTON PARK SHIPPING CO PTE.LTD. et al
as 2:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
SEAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
CARLTON PARK SHIPPING CO PTE.LTD. and A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Maersk A/S v. Vilkon N A Inc
as 2:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Maersk A/S
Defendant:
Vilkon N.A. Inc. and Vilkon N A Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
McCray v. Maersk Line Limited et al
as 4:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Kevin McCray
Defendant:
Maersk Line Limited and Maersk Line-LTD, USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Colomer v. Maersk Line Limited
as 2:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Jesus Colomer
Defendant:
MAERSK LINE LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SCHALALBEO v. DAMCO DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
ANGELA SCHALALBEO
Cross Defendant:
DAMCO DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC., THE MAERSK GROUP, MAERSK and others
Defendant:
MSC, MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO. USA, HERCULES CHASSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Colomer v. Maersk Line Limited
as 1:2022cv07347
Plaintiff:
Jesus Colomer
Defendant:
Maersk Line Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Amick v. Maersk Line, Limited,
as 4:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Steve Amick
Defendant:
Maersk Line, Limited,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Okpere v. Maersk Line, Limited
as 4:2022cv03764
Plaintiff:
Ehimarey Okpere
Defendant:
Maersk Line, Limited
Intervenor:
Ceres Terminals Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
