Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wren et al v. Stokes et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Michael Wren and Quarneice Wren
Defendant:
Michael Stokes and Saddle Creek Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
STOKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24319
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STOKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paulino, Jr. et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv00640
Plaintiff:
Diana Stokes, Roberto Diaz Paulino, Jr. and Michael Stokes
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paulino, Jr. et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv00641
Plaintiff:
Diana Stokes, Roberto Diaz Paulino, Jr. and Michael Stokes
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52231
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stokes et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07599
Plaintiff:
Patricia Stokes and Michael Stokes
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUNTER et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv06123
Plaintiff:
ETTA MAE HUNTER, ROGER PARKS, JERRY ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sexton v. Kenton County Detention Center et al
as 2:2007cv00130
Plaintiff:
Robin Sexton and Robin Sexton
Defendant:
Kenton County Detention Center, Kenton County Fiscal Court, Terry W. Carl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
