Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HUNT v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION GENERAL COUNSEL
as 2:2023cv22866
Plaintiff:
BENNIE N. HUNT, JR.
Defendant:
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION GENERAL COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
HUNT v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2023cv22864
Plaintiff:
BENNIE N. HUNT, JR.
Defendant:
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HOSPITAL and V.A. LYONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
HUNT v. V.A. GENERAL COUNSEL
as 2:2023cv22857
Plaintiff:
BENNIE N. HUNT, JR.
Defendant:
V.A. GENERAL COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
HUNT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73505
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY N. HUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNT, JR. v. U.S. POST OFFICE
as 2:2018cv11642
Defendant:
U.S. POST OFFICE
Plaintiff:
BENNIE N. HUNT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hunt et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01853
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Hunt and Kenneth N. Hunt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunt et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25346
Plaintiff:
Brandi N. Hunt and Michael Hunt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANNING et al v. McHUGH et al
as 1:2012cv01802
Plaintiff:
SHAWN NELSON MANNING , AUTUMN MANNING , AMANDA ASTORGA and others
Defendant:
JOHN McHUGH, LEON B. PANETTA, ROBERT MUELLER III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Jacquie A Figg et al v. The City of Fontana et al
as 5:2009cv01254
Plaintiff:
Jacquie A Figg, Larry Michael Cass, Jake Williams and others
Defendant:
The City of Fontana, The City of Fontana, California Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Type:
Torts - Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
