Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HARPER, JR. v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv04625
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER, JR.
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv89801
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv09189
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Rios et al
as 2:2020cv00085
Defendant:
Southern Aviation Transport Inc and Celso Rios
Plaintiff:
Rabian Shackelford, Robert Harper, Norrick Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv57475
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv39767
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv06193
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
James Anderson , Sierra Batiste , Zachary Batiste and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. et al
as 2:2008cv77651
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER
Defendant:
TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
