Cases 1 - 7 of 7
PHELPS et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv12699
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PHELPS and THE ESTATE OF ROSELLEN DIANE PHELPS
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phelps v. MGM National Harbor, LLC
as 8:2020cv02030
Plaintiff:
Susan Phelps and Richard Phelps
Defendant:
MGM National Harbor, LLC and MGM Resorts International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phelps et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv12210
Plaintiff:
Hye Suk Phelps and Richard Phelps
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phelps et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00516
As Successor-by-merger To Medical Hair Restoration, Inc:
Bosley Medical Group, S.C. and Bosley, Inc.
Defendant:
Medical Hair Restoration, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck, Sharp, Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Phelps and Richard Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phelps et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00323
Plaintiff:
Betty Phelps and Richard Phelps
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04187
Plaintiff:
Linda Danise Jackson , Chris Jackson , Letha Baize and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. American Medical Systems Inc et al
as 3:2012cv02093
Plaintiff:
Linda Danise Jackson , Chris Jackson , Letha Baize and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Inc , Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
