Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SASSAMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02323
Plaintiff:
DARYL SASSAMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SASSAMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13640
Plaintiff:
DAVID ADAM SASSAMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SASSAMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03682
Plaintiff:
RACHEL L SASSAMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SASSAMAN v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2018cv00626
Plaintiff:
JODY SASSAMAN
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sassaman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23901
Plaintiff:
Janet G. Sassaman and Douglas E. Sassaman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sassaman v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv26756
Plaintiff:
Edith K. Sassaman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strantz et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01247
Plaintiff:
Kelly Strantz , Susan Coletta , Suzanne Prael and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strantz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2013cv00802
Plaintiff:
Kelly Strantz , Susan Coletta , Suzanne Prael and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strantz, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc., et al
as 4:2012cv02099
Plaintiff:
Kelly Strantz , Suzanne Prael , Donna Behnke and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
