Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gabrielle Aguirre et al v. Capital One Bank USA N.A. et al
as 8:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLE AGUIRRE, REYNA ALEMAN DE RAMIREZ, JENNIFER ALMEYDA and others
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A., Does 1 through 100 Inclusive and Capital One Bank USA N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
KING-MUMMERT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv03442
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
SHERRY KING-MUMMERT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GALAN et al v. BAYER CORP. et al
as 2:2018cv00837
Defendant:
BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA GALAN , DONNA GAMBLE , LISA GARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King-Woods v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv08773
Plaintiff:
Sherrie King-Woods
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv03340
Plaintiff:
Sherry King , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMP et al v. ARTEVA SPECIALTIES, S.A.R.L.
as 2:2009cv93511
Plaintiff:
TONY DARVIN CAMP, TONY DARVIN CAMP, SHERRIE KING CAMP and others
Defendant:
ARTEVA SPECIALTIES, S.A.R.L. and ARTEVA SPECIALTIES, S.A.R.L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KING et al v. OWENS-CORNING et al
as 2:2009cv73868
Plaintiff:
STELLA JOYE KING, STELLA JOYE KING, SANDRA KING QUILLIN and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING, OWENS-CORNING and KEENE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
