Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Moore v. Cohen
as 21-1702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Stewart Moore, an individual and Kayla Moore, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
Sacha Noam Baron Cohen, an individual, Showtime, Inc. and CBS Corporation
MOORE et al v. COHEN et al
as 1:2019cv04977
Plaintiff:
Roy Stewart Moore and Kayla Moore
Defendant:
Showtime, Inc., CBS Corporation and Sacha Noam Baron Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb
MOORE et al v. COHEN et al
as 1:2018cv02082
Defendant:
SHOWTIME, INC., CBS CORPORATION and SACHA NOAM BARON COHEN
Plaintiff:
KAYLA MOORE, ROY S. MOORE and ROY STEWART MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joseph Lake et al v. Home Box Office et al
as 2:2016cv00876
Defendant:
Home Box Office, Mayweather Promotions LLC, SHOWTIME, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lake
Lake et al v. Home Box Office et al
as 4:2015cv01619
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lake
Defendant:
Home Box Office , ShowTime, Inc. , Top Rank, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Braunstein v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06607
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Home Box Office Inc, Michael Koncz and others
Plaintiff:
David Braunstein
Jimenez et al v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03740
Plaintiff:
Erika Jimenez and David Smith
Defendant:
Top Rank, Inc. , Mayweather Promotions LLC , Robert Arum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Braunstein v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03572
Plaintiff:
David Braunstein
Defendant:
Top Rank, Inc. , Robert Arum , Todd Duboef and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
TYSON-SILVERA v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2015cv02930
Plaintiff:
DAWN TYSON-SILVERA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. DANIELS , SHOWTIME TRANSPORT, LLC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burger v. Showtime Motor Sports et al
as 3:2010cv01638
Plaintiff:
Cindy Burger
Defendant:
Showtime Motor Sports and Robin Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
