Cases 1 - 10 of 43
LIVINGSTON v. UBER et al
as 2:2024cv05839
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY TALMADGE LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
UBER and LYFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blount v. Uber Corp.
as 3:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Alivia Blount
Defendant:
Uber Corp. and Brian (driver)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. B0572YF20APU000274-00 v. KNG International LLC
as 1:2023cv21222
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. B0572YF20APU000274-00 as Subrogees of Gregory Guell and CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0572YF20APU000274-00
Defendant:
KNG International LLC, a foreign limited liability company d/b/a Uber Appliance and KNG INTERNATIONAL LLC a foreign limited liability company doing business as UBER APPLIANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Howard Barnes v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 23-1493
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD BARNES
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Howard Barnes v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 23-1128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD BARNES
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Howard Barnes v. Uber Tech
as 22-3256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD BARNES
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Barnes v. Uber Tech
as 1:2022cv06809
Plaintiff:
Howard Barnes
Defendant:
Uber Tech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Reed et al v. Uber Technologies Inc.
as 4:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
Darcheal Reed, Susan Leo Kopko and Linda Livingston
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Spates v. Uber Technologies Inc.
as 1:2021cv10155
Plaintiff:
Sonia Spates
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Mellen v. Dalton et al
as 1:2021cv00784
Plaintiff:
Matt Mellen
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, Jason Dalton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
