Cases 101 - 110 of 784
Incorrectly filed. Open MC 4:22mc00612
as 4:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sparks v. Torres et al
as 6:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Sparks
Defendant:
Major Claudia I. Torres, Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center and Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kowalczyk et al v. Thoss et al (MAG+)
as 1:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Dennis Kowalczyk and Peggy Kowalczyk
Defendant:
Claudia Thoss, Nereida Bundy, Summers Meritt Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Garcia et al v. Harris County et al
as 4:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
John Garcia and claudia turcios
Defendant:
Harris County, Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, V Esqueda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
