Cases 151 - 160 of 705
SIBLEY-BEY et al v. CITY OF NEW CASTLE et al
as 2:2020cv01232
Plaintiff:
SAH RA Y'HUDI-BEY, AL YAHUDIM DYNASTY VAST ESTATE PURE EXPRESS TRUST, THE MOORISH AMERICAN CONSULATE and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW CASTLE, ROBERT SALEM, JASON HILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ELANSARI v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2020cv04109
Plaintiff:
AMRO ELANSARI
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Zimmermann v. Doylestown Borough et al
as 2:2020cv04090
Defendant:
DOYLESTOWN BOROUGH and THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
E. EDWARD ZIMMERMANN doing business as THE FIRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zimmermann v. Doylestown Borough et al
as 3:2020cv01407
Defendant:
Doylestown Borough and The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Plaintiff:
E. Edward Zimmermann doing business as The Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELANSARI v. BARR et al
as 2:2020cv04000
Defendant:
ADAM RAHUBA, RYAN MATICOLLA, AGENT LUKE CHURCH and others
Plaintiff:
AMRO ELANSARI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELANSARI v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv03895
Plaintiff:
AMRO ELANSARI
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vorobyev v. Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2020cv01384
Plaintiff:
Andrey Vorobyev
Defendant:
Laura Wolfe, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01334
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
PITTMAN v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2020cv00138
Defendant:
P. NUNEZ, REBECCA RIEFER, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watley v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 1:2020cv01146
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Plaintiff:
Joseph Watley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
