Cases 161 - 170 of 316
Don Bradford v. Matthew Mellady, et al
as 14-6347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON MONTRAIL BRADFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW MELLADY, Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI GILMER, BLANCHE BONG COOK and others
Carter v. United States of America et al
as 4:2014cv02078
Plaintiff:
Khalil Carter
Defendant:
United States of America, Sarah Grieb, Tamika Baxley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradford v. Matthew W. Mellady- Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2014cv02031
Plaintiff:
Don Montrail Bradford
Defendant:
Matthew W. Mellady- Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Glimer, Blanche B. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORE v. HARRIS et al
as 5:2014cv00268
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ANTHONY MOORE
Defendant:
MICHAEL HARRIS, MARK HENRY, FCI MARIANNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Taylor v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-56630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LOUIS TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2014cv01374
Plaintiff:
Christopher H. McCoy
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv23237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
K. A. et al v. Barack Hussein Obama II et al
as 2:2014cv06770
Plaintiff:
G. A. and K. A.
Defendant:
Giles W. Dalby, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice and others
McCoy v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2014cv00911
Plaintiff:
Christopher H. McCoy
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
