Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Goldman v. Brink, et al.
as 3:2021cv00420
Plaintiff:
Paul Goldman
Defendant:
Christopher Piper, Virginia State Board of Elections, Jamilah D LeCruise and others
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Thomas, Jr. and Joshua Stanfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00172
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown v. Galliher et al
as 7:2020cv00670
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Amy Galliher, Joseph Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alliance Party et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al
as 1:2020cv00774
Plaintiff:
Roque De La Fuente and Alliance Party
Defendant:
Virginia State Board of Elections, Christopher E. Piper, Jessica Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Constitution Party of Virginia et al. v. Virginia State Board of Elections, et al.
as 3:2020cv00349
Plaintiff:
Sheila Tittle, Dianne Blais, Samm and others
Defendant:
Christopher E. Piper, Chris, Jessica Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00082
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Yahweh v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv01076
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Dr. Woodrow A. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
