Cases 11 - 20 of 883
Burton v. Nwokike
as 2:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Ariana Burton
Defendant:
Dr. Chidiogo Nwokike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burton v. Burton et al
as 2:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Ariana Burton
Defendant:
Ana Burton and Brian Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roy v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Rashid Jamil Roy
Defendant:
Terra Taylor, Bruce Burton, Aaron Jelliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Cricket Wireless et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Precious Burton
Defendant:
Cricket Wireless, AT & T, Theodore Diaz Torress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gee v. Burton et al
as 3:2024cv05219
Plaintiff:
Kassidy Jo Gee
Defendant:
Alicia M Burton, Alexander James Bossinas, Jr, Constance R White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
East Ohio Capital LLC v. City of Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment, et al
as 24-1453
Plaintiff:
EAST OHIO CAPITAL LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and LASHAWN M. BURTON FAULK, individually
Burton vs Southern Hills Pavilion
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Ariana Barton and Ariana Burton
Defendant:
Southern Hills Pavilion, Dr. Alshiek, Dr. Prenard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Burton v. Spring Mountain Treatment Center
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Ariana Burton
Defendant:
Spring Mountain Treatment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Konecny v. U.S. Small Business Administration, et al
as 24-1081
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, ISABEL GUZMAN, LORAINE BURTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
