Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Mitchell v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 18-1175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Seth Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Nicole Jones, Esq., Peter Solmssen and others
Defendant:
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Cigna Corp, American International Group, Inc. and others
Mitchell v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 18-881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Seth Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Nicole Jones, Esq., Peter Solmssen and others
Defendant:
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Cigna Corp, American International Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Witherspoon v. Mortech International Inc.
as 17-2918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Defendant - Appellee:
Mortech International Inc., Service Corporation International, Velocity Products Inc. and others
Mitchell v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06258
Plaintiff:
Seth Mitchell
Defendant:
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., CIGNA Corporation, American International Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1510
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
