Cases 11 - 20 of 95
TMF COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, LLC v. LEVIN
as 2:2023cv01518
Plaintiff:
TMF COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant:
REGINALD BOUNDS AND GINA LEVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
LEVIN et al v. NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 2:2022cv07019
Plaintiff:
GINA LEVIN and REGINALD BOUNDS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT, NEWARK SUPERIOR COURT, JUDGE BRUCE BUECHLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv62007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sherman v. Johnson
as 22-30693
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Latasha Sherman
Defendant / Appellee:
Karen P. Johnson, C P Commercial Properties, L.L.C., Mackey Lane Properties, L.L.C. and others
TMF COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, LLC et al v. LEVIN et al
as 2:2022cv05522
Plaintiff:
TMF COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, LLC, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE FARM INSURANCE and others
Defendant:
GINA LEVIN and REGINALD BOUNDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sherman v. Johnson et al
as 5:2022cv01309
Plaintiff:
Latasha Sherman
Defendant:
Karen P Johnson, C P Commercial Properties L L C, Mackey Lane Properties L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv61876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
