Cases 11 - 20 of 664
Matthew Peterson v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 24-1585
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PETERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DART, DARRYL HOUSTON, HUGH WALSH and others
Roberson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
William G. Roberson, III
Defendant:
Cook County, State of Illinois, Chief Circuit Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ostrow et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Ethan Ostrow and Nora Pomper
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Doe and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santoyo v. Cook County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Ruben Santoyo
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Office and Sheriff Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Dart et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Corey Joseph A. Shaw
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Erin Stokes, Jacob Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Megginson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael Megginson
Defendant:
City of New York, Joshua Wigfall, Curtis Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharpless v. ARP et al
as 3:2023cv02811
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
ARP, MLKJ Station, Friends for Life and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Taylor v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16024
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Taylor
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, in his official capacity as COOK COUNTY SHERIFF, Cook County, Cook County Correctional Officer Hidalgo, #18391 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
