Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Clervrain v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Suzanne Crouch, Holli Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2022cv08016
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv08271
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Norman v. Northwest Indiana (Section 8) et al
as 2:2021cv00350
Plaintiff:
laSandra Norman
Defendant:
Theresa L. Springmann, Diane P. Wood, William J. Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danforth v. Holcomb
as 2:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Danforth
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WALKER v. NOWASKOWSKI et al
as 1:2021cv02291
Plaintiff:
DONALD R. WALKER
Defendant:
RICHARD R. NOWASKOWSKI, MARK R. STETZEL, JENNIFER K. BARTEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
WILLIAMS v. GOVERNMENT OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv01852
Plaintiff:
OTIS WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB and GOVERNMENT OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON et al v. DAVIES COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 1:2021cv00942
Defendant:
CITY OF WASHINGTON, INDIANA, KEITH HINDERLITER, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JOHNSON and DOES pro se
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KM SPIRITUAL COLLECTIVE CONFEDERATION et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv00879
Plaintiff:
MICHIGAN MOTHER MEDICINE CHURCH OF KM, TIMOTHY LOCKARD, AARON GIBBS and others
Defendant:
SEAN REYES, STATE OF OREGON, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CODY v. HOLCOMB
as 1:2020cv03207
Plaintiff:
CONTRELL DEANDRE CODY
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
