Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Santiago et al
as 1:2013cv09273
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Smith
Defendant:
L. J. Santiago, Carola K. Bellows and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Young, Jr. v. Township of Irvington, et al
as 13-4353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER W. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAROLD C. BORK, JR. and others
Mulero-Carrillo, et al v. Roman-Hernandez, et al
as 13-2267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMAYRA MULERO-CARRILLO, AGUSTIN R. BENITEZ-DIAZ, LARA VAZQUEZ-VAZQUEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEJANDRO ROMAN-HERNANDEZ, individually and as President of the PR Medical Board of Licensure and Discipline, VICTORIANO QUINTANA, AGUSTIN VIDAL and others
Walter Young, Jr. v. Township of Irvington, et al
as 13-1690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER W. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAROLD C. BORK, JR. and others
Walter Young, Jr. v. Township of Irvington, et al
as 12-3592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER W. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAROLD C. BORK, JR. and others
YOUNG v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON et al
as 2:2011cv06855
Plaintiff:
WALTER W. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON , IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , HAROLD C. BORK, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.