Cases 11 - 20 of 330
Mills v. Dye et al
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mills
Defendant:
Darrell DJ Dye, John Doe Officers 1-10 and John Doe Entities 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANTIAGO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv03317
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROSARIO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Smith v. The City Of Rochester et al
as 6:2023cv06162
Plaintiff:
Lekia Smith
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, P.O. Charles LoTempio, Charles LoTempio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2022cv06452
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hall
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Adam Gorman, Nicholas Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LITTLE v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON et al
as 2:2022cv06077
Plaintiff:
TANISHA LITTLE
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, TRACY BOWERS, MAURICE GATTISON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
LITTLE v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON et al
as 2:2022cv06078
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, TRACY BOWERS, MAURICE GATTISON and others
4Th Party Plaintiff:
TANISHA LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
