Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Farrar v. Madere et al
as 2:2012cv01623
Defendant:
Donna S. Madere, Joe Williams, Connie Encalade and others
Plaintiff:
Leisa Farrar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anaya v. State of New Mexico, Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
Vicente Anaya
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Department of Corrections, Joe Williams, Erasmo Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lymon v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 11-2210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVON LYMON
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, JOSEPH NEUBAUER and CHARLIE CARRIZALES
Defendant:
WEXFORD CORP, JOHN SANCHEZ, ABNER HERNANDEZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kinslow v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 1:2010cv00804
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Kinslow
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department , Joe Williams , Jeff Serna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gallegos v. Williams et al
as 6:2010cv00610
Plaintiff:
Isidro Gallegos
Defendant:
Joe Williams, Lawrence Jaramillo and Hope Salazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.E.T. et al v. MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CENTER et al
as 2:2009cv06044
Plaintiff:
M.E.T., M.G..T. and K.T.M.E.T.
Defendant:
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CENTER, LISA DEANGELIS, IGOR GAVRILOVIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neely v. White et al
as 1:2009cv00585
Plaintiff:
Larry Neely
Defendant:
Darren White, John Denko, Joe Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
