Cases 11 - 20 of 923
Wallace v. Guthrie The City of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Richard Wallace
Defendant:
Guthrie The City of Oklahoma, Logan County Sheriff The and Michael Johns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EDWARDS v. CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, EMMET G. SULLIVAN, PHH MORTGAGE ET AL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilson v. Arrowood et al
as 2:2024cv11151
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Paul Arrowood and Logan Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephen Edwards v. Steven Logan, et al
as 24-5116
Plaintiff:
Stephen S. Edwards
Defendant:
Steven P. Logan, Honorable, John Joseph Tuchi, Honorable, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Logan v. Corewell Health et al
as 1:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Michael Logan
Defendant:
Corewell Health, Trinity Health, Humana Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Nicholas Bullock v. Charlie Paris, et al
as 24-10674
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS M. BULLOCK
Defendant:
CHARLIE PARIS, HUBERT PARKER, JOHN MARSHALL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
