Cases 11 - 20 of 926
Byonca Logan v. City of Mobile, et al
as 24-11365
Plaintiff:
BYONCA LOGAN
Defendant:
CITY OF MOBILE and MICHAEL ISRAEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Wilson v. Arrowood et al
as 2:2024cv11151
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Paul Arrowood and Logan Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephen Edwards v. Steven Logan, et al
as 24-5116
Plaintiff:
Stephen S. Edwards
Defendant:
Steven P. Logan, Honorable, John Joseph Tuchi, Honorable, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Bengtson, Mitchell v. Carlson, Christen et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Mitchell E. Bengston and Mitchell E. Bengtson
Defendant:
Christen A. Carlson, Eric P. Carlson, Peter Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. Corewell Health et al
as 1:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Michael Logan
Defendant:
Corewell Health, Trinity Health, Humana Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Woods v. City of St. Ann, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Michelle Woods
Defendant:
City of St. Ann, Missouri, Aaron Jimenez, Stefan Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
