Cases 11 - 20 of 873
Taylor v. Mendez et al
as 4:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Taylor
Defendant:
Houston Police Department Sgt R. Mendez, Officer 2 and R. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard P. Avila v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Avila
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino, Employment Development Department, California State License Board Swift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCowan (PS) v. Freed & Shepherd P.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Sarah McCowan
Defendant:
Robert Freed, George Shepherd, Lisa McCowan Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dad's Place of Bryan, Ohio v. City of Bryan et al.
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Dad's Place of Bryan, Ohio
Defendant:
City of Bryan, Mayor Carrie Schlade, Jamie Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mendez et al v. Cano
as 1:2023cv01160
Plaintiff:
Raymond F Mendez and Margaret A Mendez
Defendant:
Matt Cano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DODSON et al v. MENDEZ et al
as 2:2023cv22797
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON and K. D.
Defendant:
RAYNALDO MENDEZ, NAAZNEEN KHAN, NEWARK BOARD OF EDUCATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
