Cases 11 - 20 of 53
DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA et al v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00457
Plaintiff:
DONNA PERMAR, REGINA WHITNEY EDWARDS, ROBERT K PRIDDY II and others
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DAVID C BLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Bufflehead Point, LLC v. Pamlico County et al
as 4:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Pamlico County, Scott Lenhart and North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff:
Bufflehead Point, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burl Anderson Howell v. George A. Wood
as 18-1315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BURL ANDERSON HOWELL and ALICE A. HOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE A. WOOD, County Manager for the Wayne County NC Department of Social Services (WCNCDSS) in his managerial capacity for injunctive relief, RESEE PHELPS, Income Maintenance Supervisor for WCNCDSS sued in her individual and official capacities for monetary and equitable relief, LOU JONES, Case Worker for WCNCDSS sued directly in her individual for same and others
WRIGHT V. SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00063
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., JASON JUNKINS, MANUEL MALDONADO and others
Plaintiff:
JOY OWEN WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Dill et al v. Cumberland County Social Services et al
as 4:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dill and Kasey Dill
Defendant:
Cumberland County Social Services, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services ("DHHS"), Allissa Brashear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Davis, Jr. v. Melanie Shekita
as 16-2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., on behalf of and as next friend of J.F.D., a minor
Plaintiff:
J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
MELANIE A. SHEKITA, Individually and as a Wake County NC Assistant District Attorney for the State of North Carolina, MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and as a Police Detective for the Cary North Carolina Police Department, DANIELLE DOYLE, individually and as a Wake County North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Child Protective Services Social Worker and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Melanie Shekita
as 16-1965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., on behalf of and as next friend of J.F.D., a minor
Plaintiff:
J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
MELANIE A. SHEKITA, Individually and as a Wake County NC Assistant District Attorney for the State of North Carolina, MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and as a Police Detective for the Cary North Carolina Police Department, DANIELLE DOYLE, individually and as a Wake County North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Child Protective Services Social Worker and others
William Scott Davis, Jr. v. Melanie A. Shekita
as 16-1526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., on behalf of and as next friend of J.F.D., a minor
Plaintiff:
J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
MELANIE A. SHEKITA, Individually and as a Wake County NC Assistant District Attorney for the State of North Carolina, MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and as a Police Detective for the Cary North Carolina Police Department, DANIELLE DOYLE, individually and as a Wake County North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Child Protective Services Social Worker and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Melanie Shekita
as 15-2287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., on behalf of and as next friend of J.F.D., a minor
Plaintiff:
J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
MELANIE A. SHEKITA, Individually and as a Wake County NC Assistant District Attorney for the State of North Carolina, MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and as a Police Detective for the Cary North Carolina Police Department, DANIELLE DOYLE, individually and as a Wake County North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Child Protective Services Social Worker and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
