Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Mitchell v. Macy's Inc.
as 18-1861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Seth Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
Macy's Inc., Bloomingdale's, Prudential Financial, Inc. and others
Defendant:
American Arbitration Association (AAA), Ann Lesser, Esq., Heather Santo and others
Mitchell v. Macy's Inc.
as 18-1504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Seth Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
Macy's Inc., Bloomingdale's, Prudential Financial, Inc. and others
Defendant:
American Arbitration Association (AAA), Ann Lesser, Esq., Heather Santo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-35477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mitchell v. Macy's, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01845
Plaintiff:
Seth Mitchell
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc., Bloomingdale's Inc., Prudential Financial, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Testa et al v. Hoban et al
as 3:2017cv01618
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Defendant:
JACK HOBAN, JOSEPH ACHACOSO, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cross_claimant:
The Township of Union, NJ , The Police Department of Union TWP., NJ and Manuel Figuieredo
Cross_defendant:
JOSEPH ACHACOSO, RAS BARAKA, Bernards Township, NJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-55197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
