Cases 11 - 20 of 46
MESI et al v. PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00638
Respondent:
PennyMac Loan Services LLC, DAVID A. SPECTOR, Countrywide Home Loans and others
Petitioner:
Eric Thomas Mesi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MESI et al v. PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00702
Defendant:
PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC., DAVID A. SPECTOR, PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC THOMAS MESI, PATRICIA VERGILS, WELLS FARGO MORTGAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv03073
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lath v. PennyMac Loan Services LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00928
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services LLC and Credit Suisses First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.
Plaintiff:
Sanjeev Lath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garrett v. Pennymac Loan Services et al
as 3:2018cv00718
Plaintiff:
June Garrett
Defendant:
Pennymac Loan Services , Stanford L. Kurland , James K. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Christine Montague v. State of Georgia
as 17-13490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINE MONTAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GAIL C. FLAKE, KIMBERLY WEBER and others
Pennymac Holdings, LLC v. Glenn Song et al
as 2:2016cv08503
Defendant:
Does, Isai Quezada and Glenn Song
Plaintiff:
Pennymac Holdings, LLC
Glenn Song et al v. PennyMac Holdings LLC
as 2:2016cv02827
Plaintiff:
Romy Kang and Glenn Song
Defendant:
PennyMac Holdings LLC
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 2:2015cv01238
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 2:2015cv01154
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
