Cases 11 - 16 of 16
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. COOPER et al
as 1:2018cv01034
Plaintiff:
WINSTON SALEM - FORSYTH COUNTY NAACP, CHAPEL HILL - CARRBORO NAACP, MOORE COUNTY NAACP and others
Defendant:
KEN RAYMOND, STELLA ANDERSON, JAY HEMPHILL and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives and Philip E. Berger, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Doe #1 v. Roy Cooper, III
as 16-1596
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, #1, JOHN DOE, #2, JOHN DOE, #3 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROY A. COOPER, III, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, FRANK PARRISH, District Attorney, District 01, SETH EDWARDS, District Attorney, District 02 and others
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, Governor of the State of North Carolina
Ginsburg v. McCrory et al
as 5:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Martin A. Ginsburg
Defendant:
Patrick L. McCrory, Roy A. Cooper, III, Richard Burr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe #1 v. Roy Cooper, III
as 16-6026
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, #1, JOHN DOE, #2, JOHN DOE, #3 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROY A. COOPER, III, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, FRANK PARRISH, District Attorney, District 01, SETH EDWARDS, District Attorney, District 02 and others
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, Governor of the State of North Carolina
GOODWIN v. CLARK, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00458
Plaintiff:
WESLEY FOUST-GRAHAM GOODWIN
Defendant:
SUSAN KELLY GOODWIN CLARK, NC STATE BAR, NORMAN B. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE #1 et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00711
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, FRANK PARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #1 , JOHN DOE #2 , JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
