Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 194
Lancaster v. Board of Education Baltimore County et al
as 1:2021cv03116
Plaintiff: Courtney Lancaster
Defendant: Board of Education Baltimore County, Principal Jason Feiler, Vice Principal Lauren Stuart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021cv81823
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA and COMMON CAUSE
Defendant: Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee and NATIONAL REPUBLICATION SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021mc81824
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant: Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONALCOMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
3Rd Party Defendant: The Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021cv81824
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant: Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONALCOMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
3Rd Party Defendant: The Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA INC et al v. LEE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00186
Defendant: ASHLEY MOODY, JULIE MARCUS, MELISSA ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT BRIGHAM, BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, INC., CECILE SCOON and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. LEE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00187
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA and COMMON CAUSE
Defendant: LAUREL M. LEE, LAUREL M LEE, KIM A BARTON and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Pichai et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00228
Defendant: Arthur Cohen, Francesco De Ferrari, Phil Gross and others
Plaintiff: Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lancaster v. Baltimore County Maryland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03685
Defendant: Baltimore County Maryland, ..., Board of Education of Baltimore County d/b/a Baltimore County Public Schools, Vice Principal Lauren Stuart and others
Plaintiff: Courtney Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Delphine Allen, et al v. City of Oakland, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16332
Plaintiff / Appellee: BOBBY PREE, KENNETH SORIANO, MATTHEW WATSON, a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem and others
Defendant / Appellee: ORTIZ, Officer, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Oakland, MATTHEW HORNUNG, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of Oakland, HAYTER, Sgt., individually and in his capacity as a police supervisor for the City of Oakland and others
Petitioner / Appellant: SAIED KARAMOOZ, JOHN JONES III, Proposed Intervenors, RASHIDAH GRINAGE and others
Intervenor / Appellee: OAKLAND POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00523
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?