Cases 11 - 20 of 350
Linker v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Linker Christopher Ryan and Christopher Ryan Linker
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berger v. Skully et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
William E. Skully, Jr, J. Dean, Michele M. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Ballard v. State of Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Mr. Stacey Ballard and Stacey Ballard
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. State Of Alabama
as 1:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Virgil Mitchell
Defendant:
State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Buckner et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Megan E. Dawson
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner, Allison Bryars, Stephanie Glispee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dickerson et al v. Noland Hospital et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Kenita Dickerson and Madesa Dickerson
Defendant:
Noland Hospital and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mason v. Knox et al
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Patrick Leon Mason
Defendant:
Sharla Knox, State Of Alabama DHR, CSE, Frank Spraglin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dickerson et al v. Ray et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Madesa Dickerson and Kenita Dickerson
Defendant:
Terrance Wade Ray and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
