Cases 11 - 20 of 236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Emrit v. Barkley et al
as 1:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emit and Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Charles Barkley, Subway, Fandvel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv24041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hines v. Subway Restaurants, LLC
as 4:2022cv00921
Plaintiff:
Keyona Hines
Defendant:
Subway Restaurants, LLC and Atlantic Restaurants, Inc. doing business as Subway 50048
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 American With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Subway Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Subway Inc., RSA Union Building and Mike Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
