Cases 11 - 20 of 188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
CUMMINGS v. BIRDSEYE et al
as 1:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID CUMMINGS
Defendant:
SARAH BIRDSEYE, SARA ANDERSON, AJ BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 23-5929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. City of Middleton, et al
as 23-2332
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MIDDLETON, MARK OPITZ and ABBY ATTOUN, Director of Planning & Community Development for the City of Middleton
Johnson v. Jackson et al
as 1:2023cv22478
Plaintiff:
Previlon Johnson
Defendant:
Flora Marie Jackson and Abby Cynamon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
