Cases 11 - 20 of 986
Vargas v. Sheriff Jimenez
as 4:2024cv03000
Plaintiff:
Louis Vargas
Defendant:
Sheriff Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06767
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12027
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12028
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Ailena Vargas v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv06605
Defendant:
Eileen Aguirre, Judith Cohen, Sheriff M Unamed and others
Plaintiff:
Ailena Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Bartolini et al v. Town of Dryden et al
as 7:2024cv05925
Plaintiff:
New York Metro Cloud LLC and John A. Bartolini
Defendant:
Council Person Christina Dravis, Vargas-Mendez, Law Firm Coughlin & Gerhart, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11873
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Marlon Torres v. Autozone, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv06103
Plaintiff:
Ruby Dayanara Jurado, Jose Torres, Marx Farid Marquez and others
Defendant:
Los Angeles County, Autozone, Inc., Does 1 to 100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
