Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Jane Doe v. Virginia Dept of State Police
as 11-1841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, W. STEVEN FLAHERTY, Colonel, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Virginia Department of State Police, SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and others
Lane et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00503
Plaintiff:
Michelle Lane , Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. , Welling Matthew and others
Defendant:
Eric Holder , W. Steven Flaherty and District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Doe v. Virginia Department of State Police et al
as 1:2010cv00713
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Virginia Department of State Police, W. Steven Flaherty, Spotsylvania County School Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Doe v. Virginia Department of State Police et al
as 3:2010cv00533
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Virginia Department of State Police, W. Steven Flaherty, Spotsylvania County School Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Michael Irvine
as 09-2351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL IRVINE, Rockbridge County Circuit Court Judge, W. STEVEN FLAHERTY, Superintendent Colonel, Virginia State Police and WARRENTON, Virginia State Trooper
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Michael Irvine
as 08-1853
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL IRVINE, Rockbridge County Circuit Court Judge, W. STEVEN FLAHERTY, Superintendent Colonel, Virginia State Police and WARRENTON, Virginia State Trooper
Wilder v. Irvine et al
as 6:2008cv00020
Defendant:
Michael Irvine, W. Steven Flaherty and Virginia State Trooper Warrenton
Plaintiff:
Lawrence V. Wilder
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
