Cases 281 - 290 of 12,149
Tapley v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Derek Tapley
Defendant:
William Jones, Robert Embly and City of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tapley v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Derek Tapley
Defendant:
William Jones, Robert Embly and City of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kirk v. City of St. Joseph, Missouri et al
as 5:2024cv06023
Plaintiff:
Brian Kirk
Defendant:
City of St. Joseph, Missouri, John Josendale, Marty Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hegwood v. International Paper Company
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hegwood
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tovey v. Diversicare Healthcare Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv06021
Plaintiff:
Feather Tovey
Defendant:
Diversicare Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Association of Early Child Care Educators v. Vandeven et al
as 4:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Association of Early Child Care Educators
Defendant:
Dr. Margie Vandeven, Dr. Tracy Hinds and Dr. Pam Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
