Cases 21 - 30 of 46
PROCTOR v. HUGGINS et al
as 1:2014cv00238
Plaintiff:
SPENCER ALLAN PROCTOR
Defendant:
J. C. HUGGINS, KATY POOLE, ROBERT TRASK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE #1 et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00711
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, FRANK PARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #1 , JOHN DOE #2 , JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Warren v. Sue et al
as 7:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Warren
Defendant:
William M. Sue, Phil Norris, John Martin Cooke, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hewett v. Sue et al
as 7:2012cv00325
Plaintiff:
Bernest Hewett
Defendant:
M. William Sue, Phil Norris, John Martin Cooke, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HUNTER, et al v. TOWN OF MOCKSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, et al
as 1:2012cv00333
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. HUNTER , RICK A. DONATHAN and JERRY D. MEDLIN
Defendant:
TOWN OF MOCKSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT W. COOK and CHRISTINE W. BRALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
