Cases 21 - 30 of 273
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
JONES v. WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
RANDALL JONES and City of Westfield, Indiana
Defendant:
WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAKOTA FOOTE, KAEDEN GEBHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JONES v. DWIGGINS et al
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHEAL JONES
Defendant:
LEEANN DWIGGINS, MADISON COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE, JAKE BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. GRANT et al
as 1:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
BRANDON GRANT, DARRON GRANGER, DUSTIN ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WATERMAN v. KEEN et al
as 2:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
CRAIG WATERMAN
Defendant:
CHIEF SHAWN KEEN, SERGEANT JUSTIN SEARS, OFFICER ALAN JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hall v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
LaQuan M. Hall
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Gina L. Jones and Bernard A. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods et al v. Richardson et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Myshira Woods and Demetri Woods
Defendant:
Latasha Richardson, Kathryn Malon, B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
