Cases 21 - 30 of 1,380
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00899
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Davis v. Stokes et al
as 6:2024cv01113
Defendant:
Brain D. Stokes, Dr. Andrea Singh and Andrew Asher Bain
Plaintiff:
Semiya Tahira Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Sanders v. City of Piedmont et al
as 3:2024cv03385
Defendant:
City of Piedmont, Brian Castillo and Jasdeep Singh
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Singh Randhawa et al v. Dept. of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv01540
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Mandeep Sandu Randhawa, Vrinder Singh Randhawa and A. K. R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03236
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60915
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SHARMA v. SINGH
as 1:2024cv01541
Defendant:
RAJNATH SINGH
Plaintiff:
MEHUL SHARMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Singh v. U.S. Bank
as 1:2024cv03556
Plaintiff:
Rosita Singh
Defendant:
U.S. Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
