Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Shaw v. Raleigh Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Corey Shaw
Defendant:
Raleigh Police Department, City of Raleigh and Shawn Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Paul Canady, II v. James Holder
as 22-1824
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL TRUETT CANADY, II, Administrator for the Estate of Jimmie Andrew Underwood, a/k/a James Blackmon, a/k/a James Blackman, a/k/a Jimmy Lee Hooker
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HOLDER, in his individual capacity, ANDREW MUNDAY, in his individual capacity and CITY OF RALEIGH
Weaver v. Abdullah et al
as 5:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
David Weaver
Defendant:
Omar Abdullah, William Rolfe, Taylore Leggett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wanda Allen v. City of Raleigh Police Department
as 22-1488
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WANDA M. ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF RALEIGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Wanda Allen v. City of Raleigh Manager
as 22-1487
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WANDA M. ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF RALEIGH MANAGER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Irving et al v. The City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Irving, Juwan Harrington, Cydneea Harrington and others
Defendant:
The City of Raleigh, Omar Abdullah, William Rolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen v. City of Raleigh Manager
as 5:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Wanda Marie Allen
Defendant:
City of Raleigh Manager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
