Cases 21 - 30 of 984
Bouvier v. Bouvier Kennedy Schlossberg et al
as 1:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Carla Bouvier
Defendant:
Caroline Lee Bouvier Kennedy Schlossberg and Hyperion Books
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Happle et al v. Ishbia et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle and Carla Happle
Defendant:
Mat Ishbia, James Daras, McCalla Raymer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Carla Williams v. Michelle Nedelka
as 24-1042
Plaintiff:
CARLA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHELLE NEDELKA, VISHWA PATEL and JOSEPH FRENKEL
Carla McCray v. Miami Dade County Public Schools, et al
as 24-10158
Plaintiff:
CARLA MCCRAY and CARLA D. MCCRAY
Defendant:
MIAMI DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS and UNITED TEACHERS OF DADE
SHAO v. HAYDEN
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
DONGFANG SHAO
Defendant:
CARLA HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Konecny (PS) v. Tripper, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
J. Alan Konecny
Defendant:
Tripper, Inc., Origine California, Inc., Ashley Tully and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vishrut Amin, et al v. Carla Pepperman
as 23-14015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VISHRUT AMIN and JIGARBHAI N. AMIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLA R. PEPPERMAN and JUDGE, LAKE COUNTY FLORIDA
McDaniel v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Justice, North Carolina, North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv10943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
