Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Cheryl Adaway v. City of Jasper, Texas, et al
as 17-40579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERYL ADAWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF JASPER, TEXAS, JASPER, COUNTY OF TEXAS, MIKE LOUT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Willis Wiley v. Devon Anderson, et al
as 15-20412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEVON ANDERSON, District Attorney, City of Houston, Harris County, Texas, ART BAUEREISS, District Attorney, City of Lufkin, Texas, LOU CLOY, District Attorney, City of Woodville, County of Tyler, Texas and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diggles v. City of Jasper, Jasper Police Department
as 1:2013cv00361
Plaintiff:
Keyarika Diggles
Defendant:
City of Jasper, Jasper Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jacqueline Bailey v. City of Jasper, Texas, et al
as 12-41269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE D. BAILEY, Individually, as next friend S.R.T.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF JASPER, TEXAS and CITY OF JASPER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Pearson v. City of Jasper, Texas et al
as 1:2012cv00501
Plaintiff:
Rodney Pearson
Defendant:
City of Jasper, Texas , James M Lout , Rayburn Broadcasting, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Pullen v. City of Jasper, Texas
as 1:2012cv00307
Plaintiff:
Gary Pullen
Defendant:
City of Jasper, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
