Cases 21 - 30 of 52
McCoy v. Nissen et al
as 1:2016cv00887
Plaintiff:
Leila McCoy
Defendant:
Daniel Nissen, Daniel (I) Nissen and Nissen Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Marner v. Jones et al
as 1:2015cv02678
Plaintiff:
Zachary Marner
Defendant:
Terry (I) Jones, Terry Jones, Daniel (I) Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillyard v. Maus et al
as 1:2015cv02122
Plaintiff:
Julie M. Hillyard
Defendant:
Daniel (I) S. Maus and Daniel S. Maus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramscher v. Qucik et al
as 1:2015cv00257
Plaintiff:
William Robert Bramscher
Defendant:
Don (I) Quick, Don Quick, Daniel (I) Thomas Brechbuhl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harris v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 1:2014cv03145
Plaintiff:
Marc Harris
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper , John (I) W. Hickenlooper , Terry Maketa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Caldwell, Sr. v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith Robert Caldwell, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, John Roberts, Chief Justice SCOTUS, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice SCOTUS and others
POLSKY et al v. WERFEL
as 2:2014cv00655
Plaintiff:
ROBERT POLSKY and LISA POLSKY
Defendant:
DANIEL I. WERFEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doboszenski & Sons, Inc. et al v. Sebelius et al
as 0:2013cv03148
Plaintiff:
Doboszenski & Sons, Inc. and Douglas Doboszenski
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , United States Department of Health and Human Services , Seth D. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dehko et al v. Holder et al
as 2:2013cv14085
Plaintiff:
Tarik Dehko , Sandra Thomas and Dehko Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Daniel I. Werfel and Barbara L. McQuade
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
